The public-facing Lake County eCourt interface was captured in error and unavailable states after an extraordinary volume of written preservation notices. That sequence is documented. The site will not let “slow website” erase the alert, error pages, packet receipts, vendor pages, and custodian-specific holds.
The same evidence also imposes discipline: screenshots do not identify who caused the incident, whether content was deleted, or whether a specific request triggered a control. Those questions belong to the native access, WAF, database, application, deployment, retention, and administrator logs that the letters demanded.
This hub publishes the contradiction at full force without pretending the missing custodian logs have already been produced. Concealment is documented as an evidence-access problem: the decisive native records were placed on hold and demanded, while the public interface state and agency responses are preserved independently.