What the Record Establishes
- The record: a reporting-contact chronology the filings say made compliance impossible before a warrant issued.
- Documented dispute: A February 19 contact the filing says lacked usable identifying or return-contact information.
- Follow-on record: A later memorandum reporting a failure to report, after a long gap.
What They Have Not Produced
- Call, email, assignment, and case-note records for the disputed contact period.
- What identifying and return-contact information the February 19 contact actually supplied.
- The case-note audit history showing every entry, edit, and author.
The Power This Office Actually Holds
A probation officer documents contact, compliance, and violations. The case notes an officer writes become the factual basis for revocation petitions, and the contact records establish whether compliance was ever actually possible.
- Documents reporting contact and compliance in the case file
- Authors memoranda that support violation allegations
- Controls what contact information a supervised person receives
- Custodian of call, email, and assignment records
The filed chronology is specific, and it is checkable. The record disputes reporting access involving Probation Officer Marisa Cervantes: a February 19 contact that, per the filing, did not supply usable identifying or return-contact information, followed by a long gap before a memorandum reported a failure to report. The full sequence is set out in the probation record conflict.
The conduct the filings raise
Where exculpatory reporting information is omitted from a file before it drives a warrant, the filings raise 18 U.S.C. § 1519. This profile names Cervantes because the source record does; it does not manufacture a coordination finding the available communications have not established. The underlying call, email, assignment, and case-note records are the verification targets.
The window that closed
A May 29 email urged the defendant to “turn yourself in.” The filing argues the surrounding sequence made compliance impossible — a compression documented in the Memorial Day window analysis. The preserved timestamps support the timing; intent and consequence remain for the authenticated records and a reviewing court.
Still Not Produced
Each of these records exists inside a government system. Each has been requested. None has been supplied.
- Call, email, assignment, and case-note records for the disputed contact period.
- What identifying and return-contact information the February 19 contact actually supplied.
- The case-note audit history showing every entry, edit, and author.
If any of it is produced, or if Marisa Cervantes disputes a documented fact on this page, the response will be published here in full, with its date. Read the correction standard.
Follow the same record into the next office
See every named official → · Rate this profile or add context →