The new proceeding is No. 133810. The six-page emergency motion is dated October 19, 2026. Its first page bears the Supreme Court Clerk’s “E-FILED” stamp for October 20, 2026, 4:01 p.m. and the packet’s submission footer identifies envelope 40575020.
Open the filed emergency motion · 6 pages · Open the filed explanatory suggestions · 17 pages
These public reading copies retain the filed text, signatures, case number, and clerk markings. Personal contact identifiers are redacted. The motion refers to a separately assembled supporting record under Rule 328.
01 / The order requested
Allababidi asks the Illinois Supreme Court to direct the Lake County Circuit Court to vacate the June 17 order lifting the stay of the 180-day jail term, recall the May 28 bench warrant from law-enforcement systems, and proceed on the May 14 probation petition on written notice, with pretrial release pending the hearing and remote status and non-evidentiary settings. These are the requests in the filed motion, pages 1 and 6.
02 / Who is named and why
The caption names Circuit Judge Christopher R. Stride, Chief Judge Daniel B. Shanes, Circuit Clerk Erin Cartwright Weinstein, and the justices of the Second District in No. 2-26-0352 as respondents, with the People identified as the prevailing party below. The filing organizes its allegations around the acts attributed to each office and directs the proposed supervisory relief to the circuit court.
03 / The record at the center
The motion’s factual chain draws on the May 28 warrant, the June 17 hearing and written order, the July 31 appellate order, the August 6 hearing, the August 21 appellate ruling, and October requests for a hearing date or controlling order. The explanatory suggestions identify the certified-record and supporting-record locations. The central argument is direct: the available routes have sent the movant between offices while the warrant and the disputed jail term make access to a hearing the practical issue.
04 / The “Get Out” passage
On its first page, the motion compares the predicament to the “Sunken Place” in Get Out. Its closing request makes the point concrete: access to the hearing promised by the probation statute. The analogy frames the argument; the requested judicial act is recall of the warrant and restoration of a route to be heard. Read the feature that follows this argument through the record.
05 / The supervisory procedure
Illinois Supreme Court Rule 383 provides the procedure for a motion invoking supervisory authority, explanatory suggestions, authenticated lower-court material, service, and objections. Rule 383(c) identifies the respondent by the act at issue and provides that silence by that respondent does not admit the motion’s allegations. The filing invokes Rule 383 together with article VI, section 16 of the Illinois Constitution. The published documents establish the motion and its requests as filed; a later ruling should be read as a separate court instrument.