The notices were sent, and the device says they arrived. As Chief Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Daniel B. Shanes is the administrative authority asked, in a non-merits capacity, to route and preserve court-controlled technical records for the eCourt incident. The fax history records ten attempts labeled to his office — eight marked Delivered. The full accounting is on the Silence Ledger.
The duty the notices triggered
Documented notice of relevant electronically stored information triggers a preservation duty under Rule 37(e). The records at issue — the Odyssey audit log, the eCourt server and access logs — sit inside the court system this office administers.
What this profile states
It states the dated notices, the device-reported delivery statuses, and the preservation duty they carry. It does not assert a merits ruling or personal misconduct the record has not established. The accountability question is concrete: the notices were delivered; the preserved records were requested; the response set is empty.
Follow the same record into the next office
See every named official → · Rate this profile or add context →