What the Record Establishes
- The record: the office served four July 17 notices on warrant, LEADS/NCIC, and DPPA data integrity.
- Named source: July 17 Sheriff notice set, records 06–09.
- Device history: Five Lake County Sheriff attempts, all marked Delivered.
What They Have Not Produced
- The Event Log and Service Attempts tables for the warrant record at issue.
- LEADS/NCIC validation history and whether the disputed fields replicated.
- A written correction or explanation for each disputed warrant field.
- The FOIA draft version history showing what changed after civil counsel review.
The Power This Office Actually Holds
The Sheriff maintains the county warrant system, executes custody orders, and is the FOIA custodian for the office's records. Entries made in that system replicate into state and national law-enforcement databases where officers everywhere act on them.
- Maintains the warrant database and its audit tables
- Executes arrest and custody orders
- Enters and validates records replicating to LEADS and NCIC
- Serves as FOIA custodian for the office's records
Four notices, five delivered transmissions, one preserved demand. The Lake County Sheriff’s Office under John D. Idleburg received a July 17 sequence of four letters requesting LEADS/NCIC validation, pre-custodial review, DPPA source disclosure, internal-affairs review, and preservation of native warrant-system records. The device history records five Sheriff-labeled attempts, all Delivered. The accounting is on the Silence Ledger.
Why the warrant system is in scope
The custody order at the center of this case became visible on the public docket a day after it was signed — the interval documented in Anatomy of a Pocket Warrant. Warrant-system records held by the Sheriff can establish when a warrant became active versus visible, which is why their preservation under Rule 37(e) was demanded.
What this profile states
It states the dated notices, the delivery statuses, and the records demanded. It does not assert a finding the record has not established.
Still Not Produced
Each of these records exists inside a government system. Each has been requested. None has been supplied.
- The Event Log and Service Attempts tables for the warrant record at issue.
- LEADS/NCIC validation history and whether the disputed fields replicated.
- A written correction or explanation for each disputed warrant field.
- The FOIA draft version history showing what changed after civil counsel review.
If any of it is produced, or if John D. Idleburg disputes a documented fact on this page, the response will be published here in full, with its date. Read the correction standard.
Follow the same record into the next office
See every named official → · Rate this profile or add context →