What the Record Establishes

  • She forwarded the May 28 warrant notification to the records supervisor forty-one minutes before the disputed warrant print was generated.

What They Have Not Produced

  • The Service Attempts table for the warrant at issue.
  • Warrant entry timestamps and the LEADS transmission record.
  • Whether the entry replicated to NCIC before it was visible on the public docket.

The Power This Office Actually Holds

A sergeant over Civil Process and Warrants supervises the service and administration of warrants — the operational side of how a signed order becomes an enforceable entry that officers act on. The division controls warrant entry, service attempts, and the records that document both.

  • Supervises warrant service and civil process operations
  • Controls warrant entry and service-attempt documentation
  • Routes warrant records between operational and records units
  • Custodian of service-attempt history

She is the first link in the July 15 chain. At 1:36 p.m., Sergeant Katie Gordon forwarded the original May 28 eCourt warrant notification to the Sheriff’s records supervisor. Forty-one minutes later the disputed Warrant Details record was printed. Eleven minutes after that, the draft FOIA response went to county civil counsel.

Why the forward matters

It establishes the chronology and the internal route. It also places the Civil Process and Warrants Division — the custodian of the Service Attempts table — inside the sequence that produced the record now in dispute. No misconduct is attributed to this forward; it is the timeline anchor.

The records her division holds

Service attempts, entry history, and the operational documentation of how this warrant moved from signature to enforceable entry. Those records bear directly on the interval between signature and public visibility. They have been requested.

The Documented Chronology

  1. May 28, 2026, 10:56 a.m.

    The eCourt warrant notification issues.

  2. July 15, 2026, 1:36 p.m.

    She forwards it to the records supervisor.

  3. July 15, 2026, 2:17 p.m.

    The disputed Warrant Details record is printed.

  4. July 15, 2026, 2:28 p.m.

    The draft FOIA response goes to county civil counsel.

Still Not Produced

Each of these records exists inside a government system. Each has been requested. None has been supplied.

  • The Service Attempts table for the warrant at issue.
  • Warrant entry timestamps and the LEADS transmission record.
  • Whether the entry replicated to NCIC before it was visible on the public docket.

If any of it is produced, or if Katie Gordon disputes a documented fact on this page, the response will be published here in full, with its date. Read the correction standard.

Follow the same record into the next office

Every named official → · The investigation behind this dossier → · Add context or rate this profile →