What the Record Establishes
- She sent two prosecutors a request to revoke on four grounds — including a drug ground a written clearance had already answered four months earlier.
What They Have Not Produced
- The native probation case-note export — every entry, edit, author, and timestamp.
- Whether the December 10 clearance was in the file on April 8, 2026.
- What source record supported each of the four stated grounds, and its date of arrival.
The Power This Office Actually Holds
An Adult Probation unit manager supervises officers and controls what the department formally asks the State’s Attorney to do. A petition-to-revoke request is the mechanism that converts a supervision file into a criminal custody proceeding. When probation asks for revocation, the department is asserting that its records support each stated ground.
- Supervises probation officers and reviews their case documentation
- Formally requests that the State’s Attorney file a petition to revoke
- Controls what the department’s file contains and what accompanies a referral
- Custodian of the case-note history that documents each alleged violation
A probation department asking for revocation is asserting that its file supports every ground it lists. This one listed four. On April 8, 2026, Lake County Adult Probation unit manager Lori Carrier emailed Assistant State’s Attorneys Benjamin Dillon and Nicholas Shepherd a request to file a petition to revoke, citing failure to report, amphetamine use, failure to complete public service, and failure to attend a victim-impact panel.
Ground two had already been answered in writing
Four months earlier, on December 10, 2025, Cook County Probation had cleared the November 20 test in writing as consistent with a verified prescription. That document exists. The question this profile puts on the record is narrow and answerable: was that clearance in the file when the four-ground request went out? See the probation record conflict.
And ground one runs into the compliance report
The failure-to-report ground has to be measured against the department’s own August 7, 2025 report certifying full compliance and against the compressed window in which contact was allegedly missed. Both records are in the government’s hands.
What this profile states
It states the documented act: a dated request, four enumerated grounds, two named recipients, and a prior written clearance covering one of the grounds. It does not assert that the request was knowingly false — that is a determination requiring the case-note export nobody has produced. The narrow point is that the exculpatory document existed first.
The Documented Chronology
- August 7, 2025
Pretrial Services reports full compliance to prosecution and defense.
- November 20, 2025
The drug test at issue.
- December 10, 2025
Cook County Probation clears that test in writing as prescription-compliant.
- April 8, 2026
She emails two prosecutors a four-ground request to revoke, one ground being amphetamine use.
- May 28, 2026
A zero-bond custody warrant issues.
Still Not Produced
Each of these records exists inside a government system. Each has been requested. None has been supplied.
- The native probation case-note export — every entry, edit, author, and timestamp.
- Whether the December 10 clearance was in the file on April 8, 2026.
- What source record supported each of the four stated grounds, and its date of arrival.
If any of it is produced, or if Lori Carrier disputes a documented fact on this page, the response will be published here in full, with its date. Read the correction standard.
Follow the same record into the next office
Every named official → · The investigation behind this dossier → · Add context or rate this profile →