What the Record Establishes

  • The State had a written, official, clean-compliance finding in its own inbox before the plea.
  • The revocation request is a document with a sender, four enumerated grounds, and two named prosecutor recipients.
  • One of the four grounds is the same drug test a Cook County clearance letter had already attributed to a verified prescription.

What They Have Not Produced

  • The native probation case-note history — every entry, edit, and author, in export form rather than summary.
  • What source records supported each of the four April grounds, and the date each arrived.
  • Whether the December 10 written clearance travelled with the file, or was left behind.

The county wrote it down twice, and the two documents point in opposite directions. On August 7, 2025, Pretrial Services put in writing that the defendant was in full compliance and told the court it could consider reducing or removing supervision altogether. That report went by email to the prosecution and the defense — nobody can claim they did not see it. Eight months later, a Lake County Adult Probation unit manager emailed two Assistant State’s Attorneys asking them to file a petition to revoke, listing failure to report, amphetamine use, failure to complete public service, and failure to attend a victim-impact panel.

The two-stage argument, answered in advance

The expected response is that these are different supervision stages: the August report covered pretrial release before the September plea, and the April request covered post-plea probation. Fine. That distinction is real, and it is why this page does not claim the compliance finding erases every later allegation. What it does mean is that the office and the named lawyers held an official clean-status report on this defendant, and the later theory had to be built on records created after it. Those records are exactly what has never been produced in native form.

One of the four grounds was already answered — in writing

The amphetamine ground is not a new discovery. A separate written clearance attributed that result to a verified prescription. So the question is not rhetorical: did the clearance letter travel with the file to Lake County, or did the four-ground request go out with one ground already known to be answerable? A case-note export settles that in an afternoon. The county has not produced one. See the probation record conflict for the two documents side by side.

Where the paperwork went next

The petition to revoke drove a zero-bond warrant. The warrant then appeared in a Sheriff’s database record carrying 2022 traffic charge lines and a felony category — the subject of its own investigation. A four-ground email at the top of that chain deserves the four source records at the bottom of it.

Open the dossier for the unit manager who sent the April 8 request.